EVERYONE PLEASE NOTE:
This is copy and pasted straight from drgurusports dot com:
Dr. Big Daddy +206*
12* Picks are 35-16 After TEXAS WIN
Texas DID NOT WIN, they lost outright by 15 as 2 point favorites!!!!! This is the second time Dr. Big Daddy alone has tried to pawn off a loss as a win in a very short time (about a week or two ago people on here caught him and called his bluff, he then corrected his record).
I don't know about you guys, but I've just about had it with these guys. They already had very good records posted on their site when their popularity spread to this site, and it seems since then, their purchased plays have been not much higher than .500. I e-mailed Dr. Big Daddy, and am awaiting a reply. I will let you guys know if he responds.
This is copy and pasted straight from drgurusports dot com:
Dr. Big Daddy +206*
12* Picks are 35-16 After TEXAS WIN
Texas DID NOT WIN, they lost outright by 15 as 2 point favorites!!!!! This is the second time Dr. Big Daddy alone has tried to pawn off a loss as a win in a very short time (about a week or two ago people on here caught him and called his bluff, he then corrected his record).
I don't know about you guys, but I've just about had it with these guys. They already had very good records posted on their site when their popularity spread to this site, and it seems since then, their purchased plays have been not much higher than .500. I e-mailed Dr. Big Daddy, and am awaiting a reply. I will let you guys know if he responds.
Yea I remember last time. My question is why would they even but 'Texas win' win anyone could pick up on that and know texas was not even close to winning or covering. If they were trying to cheat the record they could have at least put 'with a WIN' and those who did not get the pick would not know the difference. So I don't know if it is purpose or accident. Since that is so easy to spot when he puts that. I am not biased and I am not defending anyone. I have never even tailed none of the doctors on plays. Just getting that out there.
I gotta go back to work today :sad3:##):>(, so I may not be around too much. As for the soccer, I really like the Zwolle over (huge), Redbridge over and Crewe over, the other overs I will play but for kinda small. I am waiting on the totals to come out for the Scottish Cup, I may be playing the Airdrie Utd over, depending on if it's 2.5 or 3. GL!! 
<<
<<John Morrison Thread
This guy has an NBA and MLB chase system and I recall someone saying his system picks involve buying points for every one of his selections in order to wager them properly. Can anyone confirm this to be true that you have to buy a certain amount of points for each of his picks to accurately wager on it?
This guy has an NBA and MLB chase system and I recall someone saying his system picks involve buying points for every one of his selections in order to wager them properly. Can anyone confirm this to be true that you have to buy a certain amount of points for each of his picks to accurately wager on it?
Morrison is 59-0. it is a chase system..part of a 3 game series. If the hawks/spurs do not cover tonight..you play them the next time they play...and then once more if they lose a 2nd time. You recoup your loses each time by betting what you lost and could have won on the previous night. I do not think he has lost a series in over a year. It is a very reliable system. You must buy 3 points each time....
I gotta go back to work today :sad3:##):>(, so I may not be around too much. As for the soccer, I really like the Zwolle over (huge), Redbridge over and Crewe over, the other overs I will play but for kinda small. I am waiting on the totals to come out for the Scottish Cup, I may be playing the Airdrie Utd over, depending on if it's 2.5 or 3. GL!!
I just saw the Airdrie Utd over is o2 -140 on betus, I took it pretty large. I feel a push at worst. GL!! :toast:
Overs
Steve -- are Overs the only way to go in soccer betting? I rarely, if ever, see an under being touted. You would think if the overs were the way to go, the books would pick up on it and favor the odds that way. Can you give me your input to the overs as to one, why they are always the tout plays, and two, why the books wouldn't cover that in their odds. Thanks.
Steve -- are Overs the only way to go in soccer betting? I rarely, if ever, see an under being touted. You would think if the overs were the way to go, the books would pick up on it and favor the odds that way. Can you give me your input to the overs as to one, why they are always the tout plays, and two, why the books wouldn't cover that in their odds. Thanks.
